Spec-wise, it has a PC sync port, which is useful, USB tethering, which is vital, and a maximum shutter speed of 1/8,000 of a second, which has been extremely useful with certain clients. The After a comparison of both, I decided that the 1D X Mark II still made the most sense for my needs, but the 5D Mark IV impressed me way more than I expected. 30.4 megapixels with fast processors seems to be a good balance between more resolution and details without the need to have a significant shutter speed multiplier like I needed on the The areas where the EOS 5D Mark IV outperforms its opponent is by having a built-in Wi-Fi/NFC, has 50% more pixels ( 30 vs 20MP), it is lighter, a slightly higher color depth and because it supports UHS memory cards. On the contrary, the 1D X Mark II has a higher max ISO ( 51,200 vs 25,600), has a faster continuous shooting speed ( 16 vs 7fps 485 g. 1.07 lb. The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV slightly edges out the Canon EOS R with a score of 75/100 to 74/100. Both cameras share similarities, such as being part of the Canon EOS family and having similar release dates. The 5D Mark IV, a DSLR camera, boasts a larger body size of 151 x 116 x 76mm and a heavier weight of 890g. Has timelapse function. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. Canon EOS 7D. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS R Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM +5 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain JYT3. 485 g. 1.07 lb. The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV slightly edges out the Canon EOS R with a score of 75/100 to 74/100. Both cameras share similarities, such as being part of the Canon EOS family and having similar release dates. The 5D Mark IV, a DSLR camera, boasts a larger body size of 151 x 116 x 76mm and a heavier weight of 890g. The decision to leave out a USB 3.0 port from the EOS 5D Mark II and opt for a USB 2.0 one puzzled some, although Canon has opted for the former type for the new model for much faster data transfer. 1 weather-sealed (splashproof) Canon EOS-1D Mark IV. Canon EOS 5D Mark II. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. screen resolution. 920k dots. 920k dots. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. Also silent mode shot which is great for wildlife. But 5DIV has a great AF tracking system (though 7dII is no slouch) and a better dynamic range and ISO handling. Ulan's gear list: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS M5 Fujifilm X-T4 Canon EOS R5 +1 more. This 5D Mark III has gotten fatter than the previous 5D Mark II (950 vs. 907g), while the Nikon D800 and D800E have gotten slimmer from the previous D700 (1,000 g vs. 1,085 g). The 5D Mark III now weighs only 1.8 ounces (50g) less than the D800, mostly eliminating the light-weight advantage of the Canon 5D series over Nikon's full-frame cameras. Primary advantages of the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV over the EOS-1D X Mark II: 30.4 MP vs. 20.2 Smaller & Lighter: 5.93 x 4.58 x 2.99" (150.7 x 116.4 x 75.9mm), 31.4 oz (890g) vs. 6.22 x 6.6 x 3.25" (158.0 x 167.6 x 82.6mm), 53.97 oz (1530g) Full touch-screen LCD interface vs. limited touch-screen

canon 1d mark iv vs 5d mark ii